I am SOOO geeked about the Pedras stitch marker I got in my February Phat Fiber sampler box! One little cute thing, but so cool. As a crocheter, I have only used plastic split stitch markers (the ones that come in cream and green – utilitarian, but meh) because the kind that knitters use do get stuck in crochet stitches. Apparently they float daintily from needle to needle and row to row in knitting – alas, I don’t knit. At least not yet. And crochet is making me very happy right now, especially with these supercool stitch markers! Pedras makes them for both crochet and knit, btw, and I have several leverback sets on order now.
February 24, 2009
Pretty Stitch Markers Not Just for Knitting Anymore! Yay!
Posted by enneira under crochet, yarn | Tags: crochet, fiber, pedras, phat, phatfiber, stitch marker |Leave a Comment
January 23, 2009
It’s hats. Hats, headgear, hats. I’ve made a billion scarves and I want to move on up to hats. Check out my Flickr page for the hats I’ve made so far. The only problem is that I don’t look so good in hats, so I’ve given away most of the ones I’ve made so far. Working on a beret right now.
July 30, 2008
APOC-Annenberg Program on Online Communities at USC
Posted by enneira under grad school, technology | Tags: Annenberg, APOC, courses, curriculum, online communities, USC |Leave a Comment
List of Classes You Have to Take
So one of the things that I never found online when I was applying to the APOC program was that it is totally unlike the other tracks in the Communication Management master’s program because it has a very defined set of classes you have to take. The other tracks are very loosey-goosey about what you can take and when. Also, the APOC program *only* starts in the spring semester, and it’s supposed to take one calendar year, going full-time, starting in January and ending in December. However, most people are working while in this program, so in actuality, hardly anyone is going to graduate on time. I took the full load of classes the first two semesters, but will only take two of 3 courses in the fall. I’ll take the last class, the one elective, in the spring semester of 2009.
Here’s what it’s supposed to look like:
1st semester, Spring
- CMGT 534 Intro class to online communities
- CMGT 599 Intro to tech concepts
- CMGT 530 Dmitri’s class (w00t) – this is the Social dynamics class
2nd semester, Summer
- CMGT 540 Qualitative and quantitative methods
- CMGT 590 Internship (4 units)
3rd semester, Fall
- CMGT 567 Legal issues (internet policy, practice and regulation)
- CMGT 597 Final project
- and one 4-unit elective course
June 17, 2008
Crochet a baby hat vs. format bibliographic references for a case study? Absolutely no contest. So why is my APA manual open and on top of my crochet hook? Meh.
June 15, 2008
Search for the best crochet grocery bag pattern
Posted by enneira under crochet | Tags: bag, crochet, homemade, shopping |Leave a Comment
Sigh. I thought I’d found it. See pic. But in practice it’s just a little too long, perhaps by five rows or so. So I guess I’ll have to rip it back and remake the handles. (Original pattern is available for free at http://www.knitomatic.com/patterns.htm.)
April 28, 2008
I came across a very interesting article on women’s bodies and body images in Fitness magazine, of all places (the home of remarkably skinny women in tiny little shorts). The article, though, is really cool — it’s called “Body Confidence 2.0,” and as you might guess from the title, it talks about all the real women who post pictures of their honest-to-God bodies to photo accounts like Flickr and post about their non-airbrushed beauty in blogs.
In a society that is bombarded every day with highly altered images of women (have you seen that very odd picture of Gwyneth Paltrow on the cover of Vogue, where her head is too far in front of her body? WTF? Did they do that on purpose?), this movement is heartening. It’s actual human women fighting back against the tyranny of unachievable perfection that is only gained through the knife or the airbrush.
Everyone has seen that split-screen photo of a model with the “before” side showing all her wrinkles and uneven skin tone, and the “after” showing her as a dewy youthful goddess. So intellectually we know that pictures can and are altered. But being bombarded day in and day out with only “after” photos of perfection is hard. It warps your expectations of what you should look like. It makes you ashamed that you have never approached that perfection.
The article mentioned a site called BlogHer.com, and I’ve already bookmarked it. Any woman who blogs can sign up there to have her blog included in the feed. When I actually have free time (AKA after this semester is over), I can see myself doing a lot of reading here. Funny? Observant? Trenchant? Profound? Yes.
There is a site called TheShapeofaMother.com, where women who have had children upload photos of their post-pregnancy bodies. Contrast that to all the lies we are spoonfed when your garden-variety Hollywood star has a baby and magically loses more weight than she gained for the baby and tightens up, but of course (err, C-section and tummy tuck, mebbe?).
These sites are a welcome antidote to the two “women’s” sites I wrote about earlier, Wowowow and Yahoo’s Shine, which are such disappointments. BlogHer and ShapeofaMother are amazing.
April 21, 2008
Am I worthy enough for the Encyclopaedia Britannica? We’ll see. I just requested permission, as a blogger, to be allowed to access their information for free, via their WebShare program, which I saw at Mashable. It’s not immediate acceptance – if I’m just faking this blogging stuff, then apparently I won’t be accepted. But whoo-hoo if I’m in – no more slumming at Wikipedia, no sir! I mean, the EB must be better – it’s not free. Right? Not that I have ever paid the $69.95 annual fee to get access to it. Do you?
Per Alexa, Wikpedia is ranked as the 7th most visited website, and the EB website is 2,477. I have been doing a lit search for work on sustainability and the triple bottom line (economic, environmental and social sustainability – it’s related to corporate social responsibility) and tried to search for “triple bottom line” on EB. Wikipedia has an very informative entry on the term with a good amount of links; EB *may* mention the term in passing in an overview of 2007 business trends, but I can’t tell for sure because I have to subscribe to find out. In any case, no dedicated entry. *Less* information is worth $70 bucks a year?
I see that they still sell hardcopies of the Britannica. The set costs $1395.00 for the 32-volume set (you also get access to their website thrown in for free). My parents bought a set of these books back in the late 70s/early 80s, as well as the World Book (which is also still for sale. Cost depends on binding: either a little under or a little over $1000.00). I love books, but I can’t see a $1400.00 price tag without thinking that a family could buy a very, very nice desktop PC for that amount of money. Does anyone besides libraries actually buy these anymore?
Not that I’m against owning reference books: I have bought the one-volume Columbia Encyclopedia for myself and others, and I love the World Almanac and books like it. I own a lovely hardback book on etiquette, a big atlas, and the 2000+ page hardcover American Heritage Dictionary. When I moved to California from Ohio, the moving van had 40 boxes of books in it. I love my books – there is pleasure in a physical book that nothing online could ever match. But I can’t access my home library at work, or on the bus. And I doubt that any of my reference books have an entry on the triple bottom line.
April 15, 2008
Digg featured a story about a New Yorker, John Clifford, who takes it upon himself to harass commuters on the Long Island Rail Road if they are using their cell phones. He has been charged with hitting users, throwing coffee at them, and yelling obscenities at them — and even after being arrested for this behavior eight times, hasn’t been convicted.
In our APOC classes we’ve been immersed in cell phones lately. I take public transportation to work (when I don’t have night classes), and while there are obnoxious commuters on the bus every now and then, the majority of people who are talking on their cells are not rude. There are the people who have those beeping walkie-talkie Nextel phones, which are annoying by definition. Yes, occasionally there is the unbelievable guy whose voice penetrates the whole interior of the bus as he relates his adventures to a buddy. I still remember one loud young man who, it turns out, was on his way to court. He was spinning it to his friend on the phone so that it showed how cool he was, and everybody else on the bus had to hear what he was talking about, whether we liked it or not. I am usually hooked up to my iPod and can generally ignore most of this stuff, but his loud voice overpowered my tunes. That is like the reading we had in Professor Williams’ class earlier in the semester on “backstage” v. “frontstage” — from No Sense of Place — the rude cell phone user ignores those around him and draws all of them into his backstage, whether we helpless onlookers like it or not.
As for our subway, cell phones don’t work on L.A.’s red line, which I also take, so Clifford would be happy as a clam on it. But his actions seem much worse than anything a cell phone user could be inflicting upon the rest of the train car. Throwing coffee at someone?
I wonder what he’d do when confronted by the crazy/attention-seeking people on my red-line train, who try and sing to the whole train car, while most of the commuters are either too sleepy, too unimpressed, or too polite to pay the crazy people any attention.
And of course Clifford, as an act of celebration at not being convicted, lights up a huge stogie outside the courtroom. Even outdoors, cigars are much more rude than overhearing the average cell phone conversation. Yuck.
And on a much more ethereal level: sign up for your daily haiku at tinywords.
Certainly, haiku
beats the pants off five hundred
uninspired words
April 8, 2008
They call themselves “wowOwow,” aka the Women on the Web. But they’re not just any women. The website says “wowOwow is a free daily Internet website created, run and written by” several famous and semi-famous women who are all friends from way back. Um, free? Are they that out of it that they think a free site is a big deal? Apparently. They started the website so that they could “go on the Internet with [their] conversations and make them available to everyone who might be interested.” Well, shoot, how kind of them to let us eavesdrop on their perfect wisdom. Nothing like fundamentally misunderstanding the nature of interactive media. I am not equal to them, since I can only comment on their stories – I can’t post my own.
Let’s go to the homepage. Horoscope? Good hair day? You. Must. Be. Kidding.
Lesley Stahl interviews Meg Whitman, former CEO of eBay — and one whole segment is about Whitman’s fashion style. I thought Stahl was an actual journalist?
Check out the rich and entitled’s guide to doctors and taxis while traveling around the Mediterranean — Clearly, these are people who are in a socio-economic category far above me. May you find the people you intend this website for, as it is certainly not for me.
I also went to the new Shine site from Yahoo: while it contains some original content, much is pulled from other Yahoo sites. And a lot of their stories are filler — about eating cereal on a diet, why fasting is bad, etc., and some random gossip items … and a whole section on astrology. Resumes should only be one page long, per Shine. There is nothing compelling, quirky or unique, or even timely – which is what I expect from the best websites.
Why is there practically nothing about tech and online communities on either of these sites? You know, the online world where both of these sites exist? Shine did run an article about mommy bloggers and the power of blogging about bad customer service, but that was one article. Why did they decide to stay with just the old standby categories from print magazines? These two sites are the opposite of niche communities, excepting their gender bias. Both of them are as generalized as possible, which translates to wide, shallow, and unremarkable.
Give me Shiny Shiny any day, if I must be relegated to a gendered web.
April 6, 2008
Texting Order to Amazon
Posted by enneira under Uncategorized | Tags: amazon, mobile, ordering, texting |Leave a Comment
Brilliant. Amazon TextBuyIt. (Almost as brilliant as texting a pizza order.) First go online to Amazon to set up your account to enable the service. Then you can text keywords to 262966, and if you want to order something, the service calls you (automated, not a real person) to conclude the sale.




